ROTF and Sexuality

[terrordrone]

Did someone already revive the debate on the sexual aspects of TFs again because of DEV's testicular mass?

Well as it turns out, TFs and sexuality do go hand in hand despite any protests. Which means TFs can have kids. Or make us puke just thinking about it. Here is the proof:









DOWN ARCEE, DOWN


SPRINGER could use some of DEV's mojo



The first embassadors of unbridled sexual relations - cybertronian style



Um...DEV. you dropped one.

[TMIIWonkoNemises]

Here's something I don't understand....why was Wheelie humping Mikela's leg when it seems quite clear that he doesn't have any sensitive nerves around his lower area?

[GMfan]

I don't get it. What's the point of this thread?

[TMIIWonkoNemises]

Originally Posted by GMfan101

I don't get it. What's the point of this thread?

I think he's curious about why there are aspects of sexuality in Transformers when they are clearly robots.He wants to start a debate on it.

[Cliffjumper69]

Robots need lovin too!


CJ

[GMfan]

Who said that's what its purpose was? Most likely they're vestigial since there is no proof at all that Transformers reproduce through sexual reproduction. It's just people's minds in the gutter that link the "organ" to sex instead of a possible other function (ie energon storage) or that fact that it may just be useless (ie what's the point in spikes? why can't they be round? does their location on the robot's anatomy make a difference?). Problem is people view Transformers in a far to anthropomorphic way, which is understandable considering the overall similarity to our physiology, but as such people feel the need to link reproductive organs to them....but who's to say IF they had them, they would be in the same location as ours?

Food for thought folks. Think outside the box instead of the box if ya get my drift.

[dak]

OMG..... Robots don't Reproduce. he had balls cause it was a joke. they can have "mates" but not reproduce.

IF dev's balls joke was to suggest that he has genitals... who's the mother of the hundreds of decepticons in stasis or "being born" in the decepticons base? there obviously is no womb, and no female decepticons that we have seen. If anything, you take a piece of spark from a mother and father and create the new one. those bodies are living technology, so it starts off as a small bot, and advances to a larger one.

[Scrapper6]

They're just a pair of wrecking balls that wind up in a slightly suggestive place due to the nature of his tranformation. Hell if that obsessive git Simmons hadn't mentioned anything people would have probably missed them entirely. (Except those with naughty minds. And despite our best efforts we can not control that.)

[Protoman]

I......... ain't getting into this debate again.

This is fiction, fiction aimed at humans, so a caca-pee joke here in there is not uncommon. Just cause Rattrap kicked Waspinator in the "genital region" does not MEAN Waspitnator has 2 moon bases and an Erector.

[GMfan]

^ he's such a poet :P