 |
|
05-17-2014, 02:45 AM
|
#101
|
|
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
He is going to be in Episode 7. Thats why they brought in Andy Serkis.
__________________
Visit the official TFcon Toronto website for all the details!
|
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 09:51 AM
|
#102
|
Location: Autobot City - a.k.a. Guelph
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
We really need a flipping tables emoticon here. Why can't they just kill him off already? I'm creating my own canon, all Gungans were blown up. The End.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 11:45 AM
|
#103
|
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnstewling
Wow talk about a load of crap. TNG and DS9 along with MOST of the original 10 movies did a great deal to establish a good and well written universe that it took JJ and his two clown writers to destroy in just under 2 hours.
Again, your bad taste shows. I thoroughly enjoyed the new clone wars show from episode one. Sure the other one was good and entertaining, did it show the breadth and depth of a true war? Not in the least.
|
Nope, sorry. You are wrong. JJ's trek was so much better in every way and the numbers prove it.
Also, the Clone Was series was made for children to sell toys; the original was geared at adults who did not need to be spoon feed stories, ask any true adult Star Wars fan.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 03:31 PM
|
#104
|
Location: Stoney Creek, Ont
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robimus
He is going to be in Episode 7. Thats why they brought in Andy Serkis.
|
Well fuck. I thought maybe King Kong or Gollum....
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 09:17 PM
|
#105
|
Location: Kingston, New Brunswick
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Jetfire
Nope, sorry. You are wrong. JJ's trek was so much better in every way and the numbers prove it.
Also, the Clone Was series was made for children to sell toys; the original was geared at adults who did not need to be spoon feed stories, ask any true adult Star Wars fan.
|
Are you 12? Seriously? How old are you? Because I am not wrong, you are. JJ's Trek was garbage and MOST Star Trek fans will tell you that.
As for Clone Wars, again you are wrong. You don't seem to grasp the concept that the 6 seasons are a far more in depth look at the ACTUAL clone war than a 55 minute cartoon was.
Seriously, do you always argue your points from the wrong point of view or does that just come naturally to you?
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2014, 01:19 AM
|
#106
|
|
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
I'm 40, for what it is worth.
I've never really been a Star Trek fan, and I know a few hard core Star Trek fans who hated the JJ Abrams versions, but you can't really deny how much money they made. Thats the point TJ is making.
Better or worse is subjective because different people are going to like different things. Same deal with TCW.
Michael Bay also comes to mind as well 
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Beechy
Well fuck. I thought maybe King Kong or Gollum....
|
I don't know that I would believe the guy who said that. He seems a bit untrustworthy
__________________
Visit the official TFcon Toronto website for all the details!
Last edited by Robimus; 05-18-2014 at 01:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2014, 01:43 AM
|
#107
|
Location: Autobot City - a.k.a. Guelph
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
Wait a minute. The guy who voiced Gollum is going to be in Episode 7? That would be career suicide if he's going to play Jar Jar. It must be a new character. He can't be that crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2014, 09:11 AM
|
#108
|
Location: Kingston, New Brunswick
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robimus
I'm 40, for what it is worth.
I've never really been a Star Trek fan, and I know a few hard core Star Trek fans who hated the JJ Abrams versions, but you can't really deny how much money they made. Thats the point TJ is making.
|
I'm not denying they made a lot of money, but they are clearly NOT Star Trek, not even in the slightest. All they cared about was making lots of explosions and cool special effects. The writing was terrible, the lens flare was terrible, the acting was subpar on almost everyone save Bones and Scottie.
JJ shit all over what was Star Trek to make his movies. Are they entertaining? Of course they are, but they are not Star Trek.
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2014, 11:32 AM
|
#109
|
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnstewling
I'm not denying they made a lot of money, but they are clearly NOT Star Trek, not even in the slightest. All they cared about was making lots of explosions and cool special effects. The writing was terrible, the lens flare was terrible, the acting was subpar on almost everyone save Bones and Scottie.
JJ shit all over what was Star Trek to make his movies. Are they entertaining? Of course they are, but they are not Star Trek.
|
Actually they are Star Trek. It's pretty well right in the movie title. Of course, from your vantage point, you may have missed that tiny detail.
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2014, 12:21 PM
|
#110
|
Location: Kingston, New Brunswick
|
Re: Star Wars Episode VII Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Jetfire
Actually they are Star Trek. It's pretty well right in the movie title. Of course, from your vantage point, you may have missed that tiny detail.
|
Sorry, but it's not Star Trek, ask a real fan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
Donate to Cybertron.ca |
Donations keep this site running, thanks for your support. More details here.
|
|
