 |
|
04-18-2013, 01:45 PM
|
#21
|
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
This movie looks amazing and JJ should be commended for revitalizing this nearly dead franchise.
|
|
|
|
04-18-2013, 02:07 PM
|
#22
|
Location: Peterborough Ontario
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
My fav Trek films are Undiscovered Country and First Contact. Although Abrahams take has added a new "flavour" to the franchise, I like it, and Into Darkness looks fantastic. I hope it lives up to the trailers.
__________________
Looking for one of the previous TFcon DVDs? I can hook you up at the next show. PM me.
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2013, 03:25 PM
|
#23
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
He knows how to make a movie that many will watch not just a picky trek fan like myself. I love that big ugly ship that's twice the size of the enterprise in the trailer. Looks like more then one ship will be crashing into earth.
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2013, 04:06 PM
|
#24
|
Location: Fredericton, NB
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
Admittedly, I'm a Janeway fan. Grew up in a Trek-watching home, but Voyager was the only series I got to watch on a regular basis.
While Wrath of Kahn will likely always be my favourite Trek movie, I really like the new Trek from Abrams and it honestly has not only brought Star Trek back from the brink, but managed to bring it to a larger audience than before.
That said, anyone else think that Harrison's ship appears to be based of the Excelsior class? And also, why does it have rail guns?
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2013, 10:33 PM
|
#26
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
Anyone like the new Klingons? They have the new helmets probably to hide they don't have forehead ridges lol.
Last edited by Ned1701; 04-18-2013 at 10:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2013, 11:26 PM
|
#27
|
Location: Fredericton, NB
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ned1701
|
Looking closer at the image, it appears to only have one nacelle and it doesn't have the distinctive shape of the Constitution class's neck. The saucer section also has some structuring on top that is reminiscent of the Excelsior.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2013, 12:59 AM
|
#28
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ned1701
Anyone like the new Klingons? They have the new helmets probably to hide they don't have forehead ridges lol.
|
Those were Klingons? I thought they might have been Gorn.
__________________
Just when I thought I was out... they pull me back in.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2013, 01:00 AM
|
#29
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellboy
Those were Klingons? I thought they might have been Gorn.
|
yeah they looked like that in the deleted scenes for the 2009 star trek
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2013, 01:03 AM
|
#30
|
|
|
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commandoclone87
Looking closer at the image, it appears to only have one nacelle and it doesn't have the distinctive shape of the Constitution class's neck. The saucer section also has some structuring on top that is reminiscent of the Excelsior.
|
If it is at all a federation design, stolen or whatever it should have 2 I would think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
Donate to Cybertron.ca |
Donations keep this site running, thanks for your support. More details here.
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.
