Re: I guess this is a way to stop sugar daddies
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metroplex79
ARTICLE: Couple has no home, kids together but still considered spouses, Ontario’s top court rules
(very long article didn't quote the whole thing)
Wow, a $6 million payout of "spousal support" for someone who isn't legally a spouse, nor living together, nor having any children with. Plus going on vacations together is considered "cohabitation".
He obviously gave her a lot to her during the relationship, but now the courts feel she should get more now that their relationship is over.
Me no understand.
|
The spousal support is about maintaining a standard of life. This guy thought he was smart and on paper kept them living apart. But he did everything else for her and paid for everything. The were together for what? 10 years? They were together
I understand the decision but I'm not fool. The rich dude will appeal the decision.
__________________
There from the start, there until the end! ***PROUD SUPPORTER OF 3RD PARTY PRODUCTS***
|