Robimus
09-23-2007, 08:52 PM
I just got back from watching Resident Evil Extinction and was thinking on a few aspects of adapting this type of franchise for the big screen. What comes to mind is how virtually this whole series has failed while Transformers has succeeded.
This third RE film has more in commen with with the first of the series than the second, which is a complete disreguard for plot and characters from the video game series.
The Resident Evil video game series is probably one of the most successful franchises in its industry. I mean its not Mario Brothers but its up there I'm sure in terms of overall sales, sequels and fans. So armed with this knowledge some filmmaker decided it would be great to bring the franchise to the big screen. They then hired writers who basiclly decided to re-write the entire story, thus ignoring the key characters and plot from the video games. As a fan of RE I found this incredibly annoying, they created a whole new story and ignored almost every aspect of what made RE, well RE.
Now despite my complaints they seem to have made a success of the film franchise at the expense of its hard core fans.
Transformers by comparisson embraced the characters and a lot of the original elements of its franchise. We still have Optimus Prime, Bumblebee, Megatron and the like. They maintain much of their original characterism's. Sam is also included. Speilberg and Bay made a film which both hardcore fans and people who knew nothing of Transformers could enjoy. Thus it is a blockbuster hit.
Now I think back to RE and how much better the films could have been if they had a bit more respect for the original story. In the first film, zero characters from the games appear. Everything is new. No Chris and Claire Redfield, no Jill Valentine, no Leon Kennedy, no Albert Wesker. Now imagine Transformers without OP, Bumblebee, Megatron and even Sam. They took a sure fire Blockbuster in RE and turned into a moderately successful film.
Then came RE2 and the sudden introduction of a few of the characters from the games. Jill, Carlos, Nemisis and the Stars team. This made the film a lot more enjoyable for me as a fan although the acting an visual effects were certainly quite poor. Nemisis as a giant scary muppet I actually enjoyed for cheese factor. RE2 had a good run and outsold RE in overall boxoffice, even though it is an inferior film in overall quality the inclusion of characters and plot points from the game made it more successful, at least I feel they did.
Now RE3 goes completely backward in development. Jill Valentine has vanished, poof, like she was never in the secnd film. Claire Redfield appears out of no where for no reason, no back story, basicly replacing Jill's character. The entire film is spent killing both characters and connections to the game series to start over with a cliffhanger type ending promising a sequel which I hope never gets made.
I saw the film with three other people whom enjoyed the film but know nothing about RE. So to a point I guess they have succeeded again at the expense of the game's core fan base.
I'm just glad Transformers did not go this route which I'm sure it could have. For me Bay and Speilberg hit a homerun for both the regular movie goers and the hardcore fans. Transformers the movie feels like Transformers while Resident Evil's films generally feel like generic horror films 1,2 &3.
What do the other Resident Evil fans out in cyberland think. Am I way off base or do you share some of my feeling about RE's films?
This third RE film has more in commen with with the first of the series than the second, which is a complete disreguard for plot and characters from the video game series.
The Resident Evil video game series is probably one of the most successful franchises in its industry. I mean its not Mario Brothers but its up there I'm sure in terms of overall sales, sequels and fans. So armed with this knowledge some filmmaker decided it would be great to bring the franchise to the big screen. They then hired writers who basiclly decided to re-write the entire story, thus ignoring the key characters and plot from the video games. As a fan of RE I found this incredibly annoying, they created a whole new story and ignored almost every aspect of what made RE, well RE.
Now despite my complaints they seem to have made a success of the film franchise at the expense of its hard core fans.
Transformers by comparisson embraced the characters and a lot of the original elements of its franchise. We still have Optimus Prime, Bumblebee, Megatron and the like. They maintain much of their original characterism's. Sam is also included. Speilberg and Bay made a film which both hardcore fans and people who knew nothing of Transformers could enjoy. Thus it is a blockbuster hit.
Now I think back to RE and how much better the films could have been if they had a bit more respect for the original story. In the first film, zero characters from the games appear. Everything is new. No Chris and Claire Redfield, no Jill Valentine, no Leon Kennedy, no Albert Wesker. Now imagine Transformers without OP, Bumblebee, Megatron and even Sam. They took a sure fire Blockbuster in RE and turned into a moderately successful film.
Then came RE2 and the sudden introduction of a few of the characters from the games. Jill, Carlos, Nemisis and the Stars team. This made the film a lot more enjoyable for me as a fan although the acting an visual effects were certainly quite poor. Nemisis as a giant scary muppet I actually enjoyed for cheese factor. RE2 had a good run and outsold RE in overall boxoffice, even though it is an inferior film in overall quality the inclusion of characters and plot points from the game made it more successful, at least I feel they did.
Now RE3 goes completely backward in development. Jill Valentine has vanished, poof, like she was never in the secnd film. Claire Redfield appears out of no where for no reason, no back story, basicly replacing Jill's character. The entire film is spent killing both characters and connections to the game series to start over with a cliffhanger type ending promising a sequel which I hope never gets made.
I saw the film with three other people whom enjoyed the film but know nothing about RE. So to a point I guess they have succeeded again at the expense of the game's core fan base.
I'm just glad Transformers did not go this route which I'm sure it could have. For me Bay and Speilberg hit a homerun for both the regular movie goers and the hardcore fans. Transformers the movie feels like Transformers while Resident Evil's films generally feel like generic horror films 1,2 &3.
What do the other Resident Evil fans out in cyberland think. Am I way off base or do you share some of my feeling about RE's films?